Tolkien Studies
An Annual Scholarly Review, Volume V
Tolkien Studies: An Annual Scholarly Review presents the growing body of critical commentary and scholarship on both J. R. R. Tolkien’s voluminous fiction and his academic work in literary and linguistic fields.
•Brian Rosebury:Revenge and Moral Judgement in Tolkien
•Douglas A. Anderson:Rosebury on Tolkien: A Checklist
•Carl Phelpstead:“With chunks of poetry in between”: The Lord of the Rings and Saga Poetics
•Corey Olsen:The Myth of the Ent and the Entwife
•James G. Davis:Showing Saruman as Faber: Tolkien and Peter Jackson
•Lynn Forest-Hill:Boromir, Byrhtnoth, and Bayard: Finding a Language for Grief in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings
•Jason Fisher:Three Rings For Whom Exactly? Justifying the Disposition of the Three Elven Rings
•J.R.R. Tolkien:Chaucer as a Philologist: The Reeve’s Tale
•J.R.R. Tolkien:The Reeve’s Tale
•Ross Smith:Steiner on Tolkien
•George Steiner, trans. Ross Smith:Tolkien, Oxford’s Eccentric Don
•Book Reviews, compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
•Michael D.C. Drout, Jason Rea, Rebecca Epstein, and Lauren Provost: Bibliography (in English) for 2006
•Douglas A. Anderson:Rosebury on Tolkien: A Checklist
•Carl Phelpstead:“With chunks of poetry in between”: The Lord of the Rings and Saga Poetics
•Corey Olsen:The Myth of the Ent and the Entwife
•James G. Davis:Showing Saruman as Faber: Tolkien and Peter Jackson
•Lynn Forest-Hill:Boromir, Byrhtnoth, and Bayard: Finding a Language for Grief in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings
•Jason Fisher:Three Rings For Whom Exactly? Justifying the Disposition of the Three Elven Rings
•J.R.R. Tolkien:Chaucer as a Philologist: The Reeve’s Tale
•J.R.R. Tolkien:The Reeve’s Tale
•Ross Smith:Steiner on Tolkien
•George Steiner, trans. Ross Smith:Tolkien, Oxford’s Eccentric Don
•Book Reviews, compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
•Michael D.C. Drout, Jason Rea, Rebecca Epstein, and Lauren Provost: Bibliography (in English) for 2006
“The best anthology of Tolkien criticism and commentary.”
— –
“What else can one say? The reviews are full, numerous, by respected hands, and informative. . . .another magisterial addition to the growing corpus of Tolkienian scholarship.”
David Doughan, Mallorn
— –
“A very important and highly readable addition to Tolkien scholarship.”
Carol A. Leibiger, Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts
— –
“A welcome addition to the growing library of Tolkien criticism.”
Mark Hooker, Mythprint
— –
